 |
NEW YORK YANKEES - Alfonso Soriano 25 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | AAA | 111 | 459 | 133 | 32 | 6 | 12 | 90 | 66 | 25 | 85 | 290 | 327 | 464 | 14 | 7 | |
2001 | NYY | 158 | 574 | 154 | 34 | 3 | 18 | 77 | 73 | 29 | 125 | 268 | 304 | 432 | 43 | 14 | |
2002 | NYY | 156 | 696 | 209 | 51 | 2 | 39 | 128 | 102 | 23 | 157 | 300 | 332 | 547 | 41 | 13 | |
A unique player who had an amazing season, combining Hank Aaron's power numbers with Juan Samuel's strikeout/walk ratio. He is only 25 years old, and appears to have all the talent in the world... but can he thrive with such poor command of the strike zone? There is an impressive body of evidence — more than 100 years of professional baseball history — that strongly suggests he cannot.
AGE GM AB HT DB TP HR RUN RBI BB SO AB OB SL SB CS
Samuel 23 160 701 191 36 19 15 105 69 28 168 272 307 442 72 15
Soriano 24 156 696 209 51 2 39 128 102 23 157 300 332 547 41 13
That's actually a pretty decent match. Soriano has a higher batting average and many more home runs; Samuel has more triples and stolen bases. Those differences have more to do with changes in how the game is played than anything else. Samuel had some good seasons, but never became a star, and poor defense also forced him to move from second base. Soriano's defense at second was also questionable last season.
I think Soriano is going to be in the league awhile, and will have more good seasons, but I think Yankee fans are going to be disappointed. He's not going to consistently be one of the best players in the game. Unless his plate discipline and glovework improve dramatically, I think his career will amble along much like Samuel's did.
For the record, Soriano's OPS in the second half of the season was 80 points lower than it was in the first half. And, like most right-handed hitters, he hits much better away from Yankee Stadium.
|
|
SEATTLE - Bret Boone 34 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | SD | 127 | 463 | 116 | 18 | 2 | 19 | 61 | 74 | 50 | 97 | 251 | 326 | 421 | 8 | 4 | |
2001 | SEA | 158 | 623 | 206 | 37 | 3 | 37 | 118 | 141 | 40 | 110 | 331 | 372 | 578 | 5 | 5 | |
2002 | SEA | 155 | 608 | 169 | 34 | 3 | 24 | 88 | 107 | 53 | 102 | 278 | 339 | 462 | 12 | 5 | |
|
After his monster 2001 season, Boone's numbers returned to their previous norms. Actually, he really had two seasons; he batted only .229 before the All-Star break, but batted .336 with more power and RBI the second half of the season. An excellent defensive player and an unpredictable hitter who has always tantalized fans with his hot streaks.
|
|
BOSTON - Todd Walker 30 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | MIN-COL | 80 | 248 | 72 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 42 | 44 | 27 | 29 | 290 | 355 | 476 | 7 | 1 | |
2001 | COL-CIN | 151 | 551 | 163 | 35 | 2 | 17 | 93 | 75 | 51 | 82 | 296 | 355 | 459 | 1 | 8 | |
2002 | CIN | 155 | 612 | 183 | 42 | 3 | 11 | 79 | 64 | 50 | 81 | 299 | 353 | 431 | 8 | 5 | |
|
Walker is a left-handed line drive hitter who consistently hits around .300 with lots of doubles. Ummm, can you say, "Fenway Park"? He has been very durable the past two seasons, and his defense appears to have improved. He should be a big upgrade at second for the Sox, and a solid addition to their club.
|
|
ANAHEIM - Adam Kennedy 27 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | ANA | 156 | 598 | 159 | 33 | 11 | 9 | 82 | 72 | 28 | 73 | 266 | 300 | 403 | 22 | 8 | |
2001 | ANA | 137 | 478 | 129 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 48 | 40 | 27 | 71 | 270 | 318 | 372 | 12 | 7 | |
2002 | ANA | 144 | 474 | 148 | 32 | 6 | 7 | 65 | 52 | 19 | 80 | 312 | 345 | 449 | 17 | 4 | |
I have always like Kennedy, and last year he was a key player with the World Champions. He has raised his batting average every year, he has a bit of power and some speed, is fairly durable and had a great postseason.
That said, I also have to be realistic about his future. I like Kennedy and I think he's a good player, but he has made no progress in learning the strike zone. He will do a decent job for the Angels the next couple of years, but has no star potential, and has almost no future as a regular second baseman past the age of 30.
|
|
MINNESOTA - Luis Rivas 24 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | MIN | 16 | 58 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 310 | 323 | 414 | 2 | 0 | |
2001 | MIN | 153 | 563 | 150 | 21 | 6 | 7 | 70 | 47 | 40 | 99 | 266 | 319 | 362 | 31 | 11 | |
2002 | MIN | 93 | 316 | 81 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 46 | 35 | 19 | 51 | 256 | 305 | 392 | 9 | 4 | |
|
Rivas went on the DL in April with a sore left forearm and missed the first two months of the season. After he returned, he was OK; he didn't improve on his rookie year, but he also didn't regress. It was just more of the same, which was all the Twins needed from him. But they will expect more in the future; given his young age, it is likely that Rivas has much better years ahead of him.
|
|
TORONTO - Orlando Hudson 25 S/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | A | 96 | 358 | 102 | 16 | 2 | 7 | 54 | 48 | 37 | 42 | 285 | 354 | 399 | 9 | 5 | |
2000 | AA | 39 | 134 | 32 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 18 | 239 | 320 | 358 | 3 | 2 | |
2001 | AA-AAA | 139 | 500 | 153 | 36 | 11 | 8 | 82 | 79 | 60 | 76 | 306 | 380 | 470 | 19 | 6 | |
2002 | AAA | 100 | 417 | 127 | 27 | 3 | 10 | 63 | 37 | 35 | 54 | 305 | 363 | 456 | 8 | 5 | |
2002 | TOR | 54 | 192 | 53 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 20 | 23 | 11 | 27 | 276 | 319 | 443 | 0 | 1 | |
The Blue Jays entered 2002 with two second basemen: injury-prone veteran Homer Bush, and hot young prospect Orlando Hudson. In spring training, Hudson commented that GM J.P. Ricciardi was a "smooth looking cat" who looked like he "was a pimp back in his day". He was sent to the minors, and so the adventure began.
Bush was hurt quickly; the Jays decided to try young Joe Lawrence at second base. Lawrence, a former catcher, had to learn to play second in the majors, an experiment that was doomed to fail. It did; Lawrence was awful. Fortunately, Hudson played well at Syracuse, and was called up in midseason. He played very well with Toronto.
So, it appears that the O-Dog will be the starting second baseman, and he can play. However, the Jays' new management team has made it clear that it has no time for undesirable personalities, and there are rumours that Ricciardi will gladly deal Hudson for a pitcher. On the other hand, O-Dog has quickly become tremendously popular with both fans and media here in Toronto, who appreciate his "quirky" sense of humour. And he can play.
So, will Hudson finish the season in a Toronto uniform? Will he start the season in a Toronto uniform? I haven't the faintest idea, but as a fan I'd like to see what he can do.
|
|
OAKLAND - Mark Ellis 26 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | A | 132 | 484 | 146 | 27 | 4 | 6 | 83 | 62 | 78 | 72 | 302 | 404 | 411 | 25 | 7 | |
2001 | AAA | 132 | 472 | 129 | 38 | 0 | 10 | 71 | 53 | 54 | 78 | 273 | 351 | 417 | 21 | 7 | |
2002 | OAK | 98 | 345 | 94 | 16 | 4 | 6 | 58 | 35 | 44 | 54 | 272 | 359 | 394 | 4 | 2 | |
|
A young second baseman who has some solid Billy Beane skills, like strike zone judgment and doubles power. Ellis wasn't in the Athletics' plans early in the season, but when Menechino and Velarde didn't work out the job was up for grabs, and Ellis grabbed it in June. He kept playing every day even after the Athletics acquired Ray Durham from Chicago. He's an OK player, won't get much better than what he did last year.
|
|
CLEVELAND - John McDonald 29 R/R or Brandon Phillips 22 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
MCDONALD | |
2000 | AAA | 75 | 286 | 77 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 37 | 36 | 21 | 29 | 269 | 315 | 353 | 4 | 3 | |
2001 | AAA | 116 | 410 | 100 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 52 | 33 | 33 | 72 | 244 | 305 | 305 | 17 | 10 | |
2002 | CLE | 93 | 264 | 66 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 35 | 12 | 10 | 50 | 250 | 288 | 326 | 3 | 0 | |
PHILLIPS | |
2000 | A | 126 | 484 | 117 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 74 | 72 | 38 | 97 | 242 | 306 | 378 | 23 | 8 | |
2001 | A | 55 | 194 | 55 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 36 | 23 | 38 | 45 | 284 | 414 | 428 | 17 | 3 | |
2001 | AA | 67 | 265 | 79 | 19 | 0 | 7 | 35 | 36 | 12 | 42 | 298 | 337 | 449 | 13 | 6 | |
2002 | AA-AAA | 125 | 503 | 152 | 31 | 2 | 18 | 71 | 67 | 32 | 78 | 302 | 345 | 479 | 14 | 6 | |
|
Phillips is hot, hot, piping hot and a favourite to win the Rookie Of The Year Award. He was the big prize that went to Cleveland in the Colon deal; unlike some of the pseudo-prospects that the Indians have acquired recently (Alex Escobar, Milton Bradley), Phillips appears to be the real deal. He has all the tools, and age is on his side. All he needs is a bit of improved plate discipline and he should become a good player in the future.
|
|
TEXAS - Mike Young 26 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | AA | 134 | 533 | 155 | 37 | 10 | 7 | 81 | 68 | 79 | 100 | 291 | 383 | 437 | 25 | 8 | |
2001 | TEX | 106 | 386 | 96 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 57 | 49 | 26 | 91 | 249 | 298 | 402 | 3 | 1 | |
2002 | TEX | 156 | 573 | 150 | 26 | 8 | 9 | 77 | 62 | 41 | 112 | 262 | 308 | 382 | 6 | 7 | |
I think that Young surprised everybody, including the Rangers, by playing 156 games last year. He wasn't all that good, but the Rangers weren't being particular. Young has a bit of power and his batting average is decent; what is disappointing is that he does such a poor job of getting on base. That was supposed to be one of his strengths.
Nevertheless, it's tough to find a young second baseman who doesn't get hurt. If he sticks in the lineup, then I think Young will have a better season in 2003.
|
|
CHICAGO WHITE SOX - D'Angelo Jiminez 25 S/R and Willie Harris 25 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
JIMINEZ | |
2000 | AAA | 21 | 73 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 233 | 309 | 342 | 2 | 0 | |
2001 | AAA | 56 | 214 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 33 | 19 | 24 | 31 | 262 | 333 | 393 | 5 | 6 | |
2001 | SD | 86 | 308 | 85 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 45 | 33 | 39 | 68 | 276 | 355 | 367 | 2 | 3 | |
2002 | SD-CHW | 114 | 429 | 108 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 61 | 44 | 50 | 73 | 252 | 330 | 347 | 6 | 3 | |
HARRIS | |
2000 | A | 133 | 474 | 130 | 27 | 10 | 6 | 106 | 60 | 89 | 89 | 274 | 396 | 411 | 38 | 15 | |
2001 | AA | 133 | 525 | 160 | 27 | 4 | 9 | 83 | 49 | 46 | 71 | 305 | 364 | 423 | 54 | 16 | |
2002 | AAA | 89 | 360 | 102 | 16 | 5 | 5 | 54 | 33 | 33 | 61 | 283 | 345 | 397 | 32 | 14 | |
2002 | CHW | 49 | 163 | 38 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 233 | 270 | 294 | 8 | 0 | |
Jiminez spent most of the year playing with the Padres, and struggled with the bat. But he hit well enough in 27 games with the White Sox that he will probably get another shot at playing on a regular basis. Jiminez was once a fine prospect with the Yankees, but his career was derailed by a bad car accident; he was also buried behind two pretty good middle infielders that the Yankees have. He's only 25, and can probably still be a good player.
A second option is Harris, who can run and maybe hit a little bit. I think that Jiminez is the better player; Harris is fast, but he isn't a good percentage base stealer, and his other skills are limited.
|
|
BALTIMORE - Jerry Hairston 27 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | BAL | 49 | 180 | 46 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 27 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 256 | 353 | 367 | 8 | 5 | |
2001 | BAL | 159 | 532 | 124 | 25 | 5 | 8 | 63 | 47 | 44 | 73 | 233 | 305 | 344 | 29 | 11 | |
2002 | BAL | 122 | 426 | 114 | 25 | 3 | 5 | 55 | 32 | 34 | 55 | 268 | 329 | 376 | 21 | 6 | |
|
Hairston had his best season; though he's not great, he is good enough that if he can keep playing as well as he did last year then he will keep his job. I've always liked Hairston, and there is still the outside chance that he will become a good Fernando Vina-type player — well, that's maybe a little too optimistic, maybe he will become the next Alex Cora.
|
|
DETROIT - Damian Easley 33 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | DET | 126 | 464 | 120 | 27 | 2 | 14 | 76 | 58 | 55 | 79 | 259 | 350 | 416 | 13 | 4 | |
2001 | DET | 154 | 585 | 146 | 27 | 7 | 11 | 77 | 65 | 52 | 90 | 250 | 323 | 376 | 10 | 5 | |
2002 | DET | 85 | 304 | 68 | 14 | 1 | 8 | 29 | 30 | 27 | 43 | 224 | 307 | 355 | 1 | 3 | |
|
Easley missed much of April and all of May with a pulled oblique muscle. He played well enough in July to perhaps suggest that he still has something left, but wrist pain ruined the final two months of the season. A good athlete who can probably still contribute in a limited role, but he's all through playing second base on daily basis.
|
|
KANSAS CITY - Carlos Febles 27 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
2000 | KC | 100 | 339 | 87 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 59 | 29 | 36 | 48 | 257 | 345 | 316 | 17 | 6 | |
2001 | KC | 79 | 292 | 69 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 45 | 25 | 22 | 58 | 236 | 291 | 363 | 5 | 2 | |
2002 | KC | 119 | 351 | 86 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 44 | 26 | 41 | 63 | 245 | 336 | 348 | 16 | 5 | |
Febles played very well as a rookie in 1999, but the last three seasons have been disasters for him. Last year he struggled at the plate, and was demoted to the minors in midseason. He didn't play well at Omaha, either.
The Royals have apparently penciled him in to be the starting second baseman this year, but they have to decide whether they're really serious about him. Febles still does some things well; his on-base percentage was decent, and he stole some bases. It made no sense at all to demote him to the minors while sticking with Neifi Perez, who was much worse. Maybe they were trying to teach Febles a lesson, but geez, he's 27 years old now, it's time to either play him or dump him.
I think that Febles has some ability, and is a better option than, say, Jose Ortiz or Mark Grudzielanek. But after three seasons of similar performance, it's time to stop grumbling about him; he is what he is.
|
|
TAMPA BAY - Brent Abernathy 26 R/R or Marlon Anderson 29 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
ABERNATHY | |
2000 | AAA | 119 | 449 | 130 | 27 | 2 | 5 | 61 | 50 | 37 | 43 | 290 | 341 | 392 | 23 | 15 | |
2001 | AAA | 61 | 252 | 76 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 45 | 23 | 16 | 23 | 302 | 346 | 429 | 11 | 4 | |
2001 | TAM | 79 | 304 | 82 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 43 | 33 | 27 | 35 | 270 | 328 | 382 | 8 | 3 | |
2002 | TAM | 117 | 463 | 112 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 46 | 40 | 25 | 46 | 242 | 288 | 311 | 10 | 4 | |
ANDERSON | |
2000 | PHI | 41 | 162 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 15 | 12 | 22 | 228 | 282 | 309 | 2 | 2 | |
2001 | PHI | 147 | 522 | 153 | 30 | 2 | 11 | 69 | 61 | 35 | 74 | 293 | 337 | 421 | 8 | 5 | |
2002 | PHI | 145 | 539 | 139 | 30 | 6 | 8 | 64 | 48 | 42 | 71 | 258 | 315 | 380 | 5 | 1 | |
The Devil Rays signed Anderson, and have suggested that he will be a "rover" and move around the field, which I guess means they haven't figured out who their worst player is yet. I noticed more than a few unkind words were written about Anderson in the media; apparently, the Phillies couldn't wait to dump him. This is a little unfair; he's not great, but he's OK, better than I thought he would be.
Abernathy had an awful season last year. He used to be a kid who could play, but he's not a kid anymore and there is scant evidence that he can really play. He needs a good start to avoid getting replaced.
|
|