 |
BOSTON - Manny Ramirez 30 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | CLE | 147 | 522 | 174 | 34 | 3 | 44 | 131 | 165 | 96 | 131 | 333 | 442 | 663 | 2 | 4 | |
2000 | CLE | 118 | 439 | 154 | 34 | 2 | 38 | 92 | 122 | 86 | 117 | 351 | 457 | 697 | 1 | 1 | |
2001 | CLE | 142 | 529 | 162 | 33 | 2 | 41 | 93 | 125 | 81 | 147 | 306 | 405 | 609 | 0 | 1 | |
Ramirez was a top MVP candidate at midseason, but both his team's fortunes and his own sunk in the second half of the season. He is one of the best hitters in baseball, and is capable of winning a Triple Crown.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Was the MVP in May, then broke a bone in his hand.
|
|
TORONTO - Shannon Stewart 28 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | TOR | 145 | 608 | 185 | 28 | 2 | 11 | 102 | 67 | 59 | 83 | 304 | 371 | 411 | 37 | 14 | |
2000 | TOR | 136 | 583 | 186 | 43 | 5 | 21 | 107 | 69 | 37 | 79 | 319 | 363 | 518 | 20 | 5 | |
2001 | TOR | 155 | 640 | 202 | 44 | 7 | 12 | 103 | 60 | 46 | 72 | 316 | 371 | 462 | 27 | 10 | |
Stewart is a .300 hitter who has some pop and can run the bases. At this writing, the Blue Jays haven't decided who their DH is going to be; Stewart, however, is easily their weakest defensive outfielder, so he may get the nod, though I don't think he would be too happy about it. He's a quality player, would be a better leadoff man if he could draw a few more walks.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Apart from Ramirez, AL left-fielders are really boring.
|
|
TEXAS - Frank Catalanotto 28 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | DET | 100 | 286 | 79 | 19 | 0 | 11 | 41 | 35 | 15 | 49 | 276 | 327 | 458 | 3 | 4 | |
2000 | TEX | 103 | 282 | 82 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 55 | 42 | 33 | 36 | 291 | 375 | 457 | 6 | 2 | |
2001 | TEX | 133 | 463 | 153 | 31 | 5 | 11 | 77 | 54 | 39 | 55 | 330 | 391 | 490 | 15 | 5 | |
Yeah, I can see why the Tigers wouldn't want Catalanotto. After all, who needs a .330 hitter who can play every position? Not the Tigers, that's for sure!
Catalanotto may not play left field in 2002; he may play second base or third base or centre field or DH or wherever the Rangers need him. He gets on base and hits for average and has a little power; assuming that he plays every day and bats at the top of the order ahead of Greer, Gonzalez, Palmeiro and the Rodriguezes, he should score a lot of runs.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Injured.
|
|
DETROIT - Bobby Higginson 32 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | DET | 107 | 377 | 90 | 18 | 0 | 12 | 51 | 46 | 64 | 66 | 239 | 351 | 382 | 4 | 6 | |
2000 | DET | 154 | 597 | 179 | 44 | 4 | 30 | 104 | 102 | 74 | 99 | 300 | 377 | 538 | 15 | 3 | |
2001 | DET | 147 | 541 | 150 | 28 | 6 | 17 | 84 | 71 | 80 | 65 | 277 | 367 | 445 | 20 | 12
| |
A solid hitter with a fearsome throwing arm. As Higginson nears the final phase of his career, it is apparent that he will never be a consistent run producer. He does a little bit of everything, and occasionally busts loose with a big year; he would be a great addition to a team that already had some better players.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Zzzzzz.
|
|
NEW YORK YANKEES - Rondell White 30 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | MON | 138 | 539 | 168 | 26 | 6 | 22 | 83 | 64 | 32 | 85 | 312 | 359 | 505 | 10 | 6 | |
2000 | MON-CHC | 94 | 357 | 111 | 26 | 0 | 13 | 59 | 61 | 33 | 79 | 311 | 374 | 493 | 5 | 3 | |
2001 | CHC | 95 | 323 | 99 | 19 | 1 | 17 | 43 | 50 | 26 | 56 | 307 | 371 | 529 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Another year, another set of injuries. White is a terrific hitter, has now batted over .300 in four straight seasons, but he can't stay in the lineup. Knowing the Yankees, however, this will prove to be a great signing; even if White suffers his usual assortment of ailments, he is still a heck of an improvement over Chuck Knoblauch.
|
|
ANAHEIM - Garret Anderson 30 L/L |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | ANA | 157 | 620 | 188 | 36 | 2 | 21 | 88 | 80 | 34 | 81 | 303 | 336 | 469 | 3 | 4 | |
2000 | ANA | 159 | 647 | 185 | 40 | 3 | 35 | 92 | 117 | 24 | 87 | 286 | 307 | 519 | 7 | 6 | |
2001 | ANA | 161 | 672 | 194 | 39 | 2 | 28 | 83 | 123 | 27 | 100 | 289 | 314 | 478 | 13 | 6 | |
I keep reading about how Anderson is one of the game's more underrated and underappreciated players. He never misses a game, bangs out 180+ hits every year, hits homers, drives in runs...
Well, he certainly earns top marks for durability, and he is reasonably consistent. He's usually around the .300 mark, is never far above or below that level. Batting in the middle of the order pads his RBI numbers. But his on-base percentage is atrocious, among the worst of all the league's regular players. And his power numbers are nothing special for a left fielder who bats 672 times in a season. He's OK, but he doesn't put nearly as many runs on the board as it would first seem.
|
|
CHICAGO WHITE SOX - Carlos Lee 26 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | CHW | 127 | 492 | 144 | 32 | 2 | 16 | 66 | 84 | 13 | 72 | 293 | 312 | 463 | 4 | 2 | |
2000 | CHW | 152 | 572 | 172 | 29 | 2 | 24 | 107 | 92 | 38 | 94 | 301 | 345 | 484 | 13 | 4 | |
2001 | CHW | 150 | 558 | 150 | 33 | 3 | 24 | 75 | 84 | 38 | 85 | 269 | 321 | 468 | 17 | 7 | |
|
Lee's season was a disappointment. After establishing himself as a .300 hitter, he was supposed to start hitting for more power. Instead, he lost 30 points off his batting average. Like his team, I expect Lee to make a comeback in 2002; he is young and talented, and I wouldn't be surprised if he went .300-30-100 this year. He is also developing into a good baserunner.
|
|
SEATTLE - Mark McLemore 37 S/R and Ruben Sierra 36 S/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
MCLEMORE | |
1999 | TEX | 144 | 566 | 155 | 20 | 7 | 6 | 105 | 45 | 83 | 79 | 274 | 363 | 366 | 16 | 8 | |
2000 | SEA | 138 | 481 | 118 | 23 | 1 | 3 | 72 | 46 | 81 | 78 | 245 | 353 | 316 | 30 | 14 | |
2001 | SEA | 125 | 409 | 117 | 16 | 9 | 5 | 78 | 57 | 69 | 84 | 286 | 384 | 406 | 39 | 7 | |
SIERRA | |
2001 | TEX | 94 | 344 | 100 | 22 | 1 | 23 | 55 | 67 | 19 | 52 | 291 | 322 | 561 | 2 | 0 | |
There were many reasons why the Mariners won 116 games last season, but McLemore was one that often got overlooked. True, he doesn't have as much power as you expect from a left fielder, but did a terrific job of getting on base, and had a sensational year as a base stealer.
Now we have the makings of an interesting platoon. McLemore doesn't have power, but he can run and get on base. Ruben Sierra can't run or get on base, but he has power. Sierra in 2001 had the kind of season that he used to have - ten years ago. I could rank these guys higher, based on what they did last year, but they're not young anymore, and a repeat of what they accomplished last year would be a surprise.
|
|
OAKLAND - Jeremy Giambi 28 L/L and Eric Byrnes 26 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
GIAMBI | |
1999 | KC | 90 | 288 | 82 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 34 | 34 | 40 | 67 | 285 | 373 | 368 | 0 | 0 | |
2000 | OAK | 104 | 260 | 66 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 42 | 50 | 32 | 61 | 254 | 338 | 423 | 0 | 0 | |
2001 | OAK | 124 | 371 | 105 | 26 | 0 | 12 | 64 | 57 | 63 | 83 | 283 | 391 | 450 | 0 | 1 | |
BYRNES | |
1999 | A | 96 | 365 | 123 | 28 | 1 | 6 | 86 | 66 | 58 | 37 | 337 | 433 | 468 | 28 | 8 | |
2000 | AA-AAA | 134 | 502 | 159 | 48 | 3 | 14 | 104 | 84 | 74 | 68 | 317 | 400 | 508 | 33 | 16 | |
2001 | AAA | 100 | 415 | 120 | 23 | 2 | 20 | 81 | 51 | 33 | 66 | 289 | 343 | 499 | 25 | 3 | |
|
A Tale of Two Brothers: on the same day that his older brother signed a $120 million contract, Jeremy got busted for marijuana possession. While it would appear that the younger Giambi is not destined for stardom, he is a solid player, does a good job of getting on base and has a little power. The Athletics will need his bat in the lineup.
|
|
TAMPA BAY - Ben Grieve 26 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | OAK | 148 | 486 | 129 | 21 | 0 | 28 | 80 | 86 | 63 | 108 | 265 | 358 | 481 | 4 | 0 | |
2000 | OAK | 158 | 594 | 166 | 40 | 1 | 27 | 92 | 104 | 73 | 130 | 279 | 359 | 487 | 3 | 0 | |
2001 | TAM | 154 | 542 | 143 | 30 | 2 | 11 | 72 | 72 | 87 | 159 | 264 | 372 | 387 | 7 | 1 | |
Grieve's first season in Tampa Bay probably didn't endear him to the hometown fans. His power stroke vanished; I don't think that 11 homers and 159 strikeouts was the kind of production that the Devil Rays envisioned when they acquired him.
Still, it's a little early to give up on him. He's only 26, and even in a stinky season he had a good on base percentage. I suspect that he will sort out his problems and have some much better seasons. When this will happen, I can't say... Luis Gonzalez didn't figure out how to hit until he was 32.
|
|
MINNESOTA - Jacques Jones 27 L/L |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | MIN | 95 | 322 | 93 | 24 | 2 | 9 | 54 | 44 | 17 | 63 | 289 | 329 | 460 | 3 | 4 | |
2000 | MIN | 154 | 523 | 149 | 26 | 5 | 19 | 66 | 76 | 26 | 111 | 285 | 319 | 463 | 7 | 5 | |
2001 | MIN | 149 | 475 | 131 | 25 | 0 | 14 | 57 | 49 | 39 | 92 | 276 | 335 | 417 | 12 | 9 | |
|
Jones improved in some areas in his game, keeping his average decent while drawing more walks. But he had a power shortage; I expect him to do better this year, hit 20-25 home runs. He does a little bit of everything, but doesn't do any one thing well enough to put a lot of runs on the board.
|
|
KANSAS CITY - Chuck Knoblauch 34 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS | |
1999 | NYY | 150 | 603 | 176 | 36 | 4 | 18 | 120 | 68 | 83 | 57 | 292 | 393 | 454 | 28 | 9 | |
2000 | NYY | 102 | 400 | 113 | 22 | 2 | 5 | 75 | 26 | 46 | 45 | 283 | 366 | 385 | 15 | 7 | |
2001 | NYY | 137 | 521 | 130 | 20 | 3 | 9 | 66 | 44 | 58 | 73 | 250 | 339 | 351 | 38 | 9 | |
|
Knoblauch has moved to Kansas City, where he presumably won't win any more championsip rings. Chuckie's first season in left field was not a good one; he struggled badly with both his bat and his glove (though he did have one of his best years as a base stealer). He's exactly what the Royals don't need, an old guy who is just playing out the string.
|
|
BALTIMORE - Marty Cordova 33 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | MIN | 124 | 425 | 121 | 28 | 3 | 14 | 62 | 70 | 48 | 96 | 285 | 365 | 464 | 13 | 4 | |
2000 | TOR | 62 | 200 | 49 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 23 | 18 | 18 | 35 | 245 | 317 | 340 | 3 | 2 | |
2001 | CLE | 122 | 409 | 123 | 20 | 2 | 20 | 61 | 69 | 23 | 81 | 301 | 348 | 506 | 0 | 3 | |
|
Cordova had a super-hot start to the season, then gradually cooled down over the course of the summer. Given his age, his decline over the past few years and in the second half of last season, I see no reason to be optimistic about 2002. He's not a quality regular.
|
|
CLEVELAND - Russell Branyan 26 L/R or Alex Escobar 24 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
ESCOBAR | |
2000 | AA | 122 | 437 | 126 | 25 | 7 | 16 | 79 | 67 | 57 | 114 | 288 | 375 | 487 | 24 | 5 | |
2001 | AAA | 111 | 397 | 106 | 21 | 4 | 12 | 55 | 52 | 35 | 146 | 267 | 327 | 431 | 18 | 3 | |
2001 | NYM | 18 | 50 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 19 | 200 | 245 | 400 | 1 | 0 | |
BRANYAN | |
1999 | AAA | 109 | 395 | 82 | 11 | 1 | 30 | 51 | 67 | 52 | 187 | 208 | 305 | 468 | 8 | 3 | |
2000 | AAA | 64 | 229 | 56 | 9 | 2 | 21 | 46 | 60 | 28 | 93 | 245 | 330 | 576 | 1 | 1 | |
2000 | CLE | 67 | 193 | 46 | 7 | 2 | 16 | 32 | 38 | 22 | 76 | 238 | 327 | 544 | 0 | 0 | |
2001 | CLE | 113 | 315 | 73 | 16 | 2 | 20 | 48 | 54 | 38 | 132 | 232 | 316 | 486 | 1 | 1 | |
The Indians have a number of options in their outfield, none of which are very good. One option is Russell Branyan, whom the Indians are apparently reluctant to play every day, despite his prodigious power. They are worried that he will strike out 200 times, and they're right; he very well might. He might strike out 250 times.
Another option is Alex Escobar, whom they acquired from the Mets in the Alomar trade. Escobar was a hot prospect a couple of years ago, but last year had a poor season at Norfolk. He's got a little power and some speed, but he has no command of the strike zone; at the moment, he looks like the second coming of Juan Encarnacion.
The Indians also have Brady Anderson, who had a disastrous season with Baltimore last year. Branyan could play third if Fryman gets hurt, or the Indians could decide to use either Anderson or Escobar in centre. Or they could decide to use Wil Cordero.
I don't anticipate a big comeback from Anderson, and Cordero is probably my least favourite ballplayer. In the long run, I think that Branyan has more potential than Escobar with the bat. The Indians should just give Branyan the job; who knows, he might surprise us.
ADDENDUM: Escobar is gone for the year with a torn ACL. The Indians don't have a lot of outfield depth to begin with, and this doesn't help. On the other hand, it could make the decision over who plays and who doesn't a tad easier.
|
|