 |
CHICAGO WHITE SOX - Frank Thomas 34 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | CHW | 135 | 486 | 148 | 36 | 0 | 15 | 74 | 77 | 87 | 66 | 305 | 414 | 471 | 3 | 3 | |
2000 | CHW | 159 | 582 | 191 | 44 | 0 | 43 | 115 | 143 | 112 | 94 | 328 | 436 | 625 | 1 | 3 | |
2001 | CHW | 20 | 68 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 221 | 316 | 441 | 0 | 0 | |
The Big Hurt was hurtin' in 2001, but will be back in uniform this year. He is a great, great hitter who is going to the Hall Of Fame, but this is the year that he can really make his legend. The White Sox haven't won the World Series since 1917, and this year's squad should be as good as any that Thomas will ever play for.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: You know it hasn't been a good season when you agree to wave your no-trade clause at the break.
|
|
SEATTLE - Edgar Martinez 39 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | SEA | 142 | 502 | 169 | 35 | 1 | 24 | 86 | 86 | 97 | 99 | 337 | 447 | 554 | 7 | 2 | |
2000 | SEA | 153 | 556 | 180 | 31 | 0 | 37 | 100 | 145 | 96 | 95 | 324 | 423 | 579 | 3 | 0 | |
2001 | SEA | 132 | 470 | 144 | 40 | 1 | 23 | 80 | 116 | 93 | 90 | 306 | 423 | 543 | 4 | 1 | |
|
Martinez just keeps rolling along, putting up the same great numbers at the plate year after year. If you really appreciate how good this guy is, then it's easy to understand how the Mariners won 116 games last year. He is getting older, and his average has dropped a bit the past two seasons, but I expect him to be good again in 2002.
|
|
TEXAS - Rusty Greer 33 L/L |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | TEX | 147 | 556 | 167 | 41 | 3 | 20 | 107 | 101 | 96 | 67 | 300 | 405 | 493 | 2 | 2 | |
2000 | TEX | 105 | 394 | 117 | 34 | 3 | 8 | 65 | 65 | 51 | 61 | 297 | 377 | 459 | 4 | 1 | |
2001 | TEX | 62 | 245 | 67 | 23 | 0 | 7 | 38 | 29 | 27 | 32 | 273 | 342 | 453 | 1 | 2 | |
Greer had a tough season. He had surgery to repair a pinched nerve in his hip, and also had some bone chips removed from his elbow. Meanwhile, his replacement, Catalanotto, filled in with a Rusty Greer-type season.
I don't know who is going to play where in 2002 for the Rangers, but for now it would appear that Greer will be the team's DH. He is a fine hitter, gets on base and has a little pop at the top of the batting order. Getting both Greer and Gonzalez working together again should be a plus for Texas.
|
|
BALTIMORE - Jeff Conine 36 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | BAL | 139 | 444 | 129 | 31 | 1 | 13 | 54 | 75 | 30 | 40 | 291 | 335 | 453 | 0 | 3 | |
2000 | BAL | 119 | 409 | 116 | 20 | 2 | 13 | 53 | 46 | 36 | 53 | 284 | 341 | 438 | 4 | 3 | |
2001 | BAL | 139 | 524 | 163 | 23 | 2 | 14 | 75 | 97 | 64 | 75 | 311 | 386 | 443 | 12 | 8 | |
|
Conine didn't get much credit for having a great year at the plate. He toiled in obscurity for a lousy team, and was forced to play in a park, Camden Yards, which has been transformed into a pitcher's paradise. Conine has been a solid hitter for years, and is getting more disciplined at the plate as he ages.
|
|
CLEVELAND - Ellis Burks 38 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | SF | 120 | 390 | 110 | 19 | 0 | 31 | 73 | 96 | 69 | 86 | 282 | 394 | 569 | 7 | 5 | |
2000 | SF | 122 | 393 | 135 | 21 | 5 | 24 | 74 | 96 | 56 | 49 | 344 | 419 | 606 | 5 | 1 | |
2001 | CLE | 124 | 439 | 123 | 29 | 1 | 28 | 83 | 74 | 62 | 85 | 280 | 369 | 542 | 5 | 1
| |
As he gets older, Burks remains a good power hitter who clocks in regularly at 120 games per year. Given his age and his history with injuries, it is unlikely that he will be around much longer.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Still hitting home runs. I hadn't realized this before, but Burks might have the sweetest swing of any right-handed hitter in the league.
|
|
BOSTON - Brian Daubach 30 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | BOS | 110 | 381 | 112 | 33 | 3 | 21 | 61 | 73 | 36 | 92 | 294 | 360 | 562 | 0 | 1 | |
2000 | BOS | 142 | 495 | 123 | 32 | 2 | 21 | 55 | 76 | 44 | 130 | 248 | 315 | 448 | 1 | 1 | |
2001 | BOS | 122 | 407 | 107 | 28 | 3 | 22 | 54 | 71 | 53 | 108 | 263 | 350 | 509 | 1 | 0 | |
|
Daubach had a solid year, somewhere between his good rookie season and his not-so-good sophomore season. Daubach isn't a good regular - he hit just .179 against left-handers. But against right-handed pitching he is a dangerous hitter.
|
|
OAKLAND - David Justice 36 L/L |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | CLE | 133 | 429 | 123 | 18 | 0 | 21 | 75 | 88 | 94 | 90 | 287 | 413 | 476 | 1 | 3 | |
2000 | CLE-NYY | 146 | 524 | 150 | 31 | 1 | 41 | 89 | 118 | 77 | 91 | 286 | 377 | 584 | 2 | 1 | |
2001 | NYY | 111 | 381 | 92 | 16 | 1 | 18 | 58 | 51 | 54 | 83 | 241 | 333 | 430 | 1 | 2
| |
|
I don't feel quite comfortable rating three old guys (Burks, Conine, Justice) ahead of three younger guys (Fullmer, Ortiz, Johnson) who could all be better players by the end of the season. But what the heck, it's an old man's position. Justice had a lousy, injury-plagued season in 2001, but it would be hasty to assume that he is finished, only a year removed from a 40-homer season.
|
|
ANAHEIM - Brad Fullmer 27 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | MON | 100 | 347 | 96 | 34 | 2 | 9 | 38 | 47 | 22 | 35 | 277 | 321 | 464 | 2 | 3 | |
2000 | TOR | 133 | 482 | 142 | 29 | 1 | 32 | 76 | 104 | 30 | 68 | 295 | 340 | 558 | 3 | 1 | |
2001 | TOR | 146 | 522 | 143 | 31 | 2 | 18 | 71 | 83 | 38 | 88 | 274 | 326 | 444 | 5 | 2
| |
Fullmer's fortunes tend to bob up and down from year to year. When he debuted with Montreal, he looked like a .300 hitter with line-drive power. That didn't work out, so he was shipped to Toronto. There, he put on some muscle and hit 32 homers in 2000.
Last year he regressed again. He didn't hit for average, didn't hit for power, didn't get on base, and didn't fit into the plans of the Jays' new GM, who essentially gave him away to Anaheim.
My own feeling is that Fullmer should be a consistent .300 hitter with 20-30 home runs a year, but he is so incredibly undisciplined at the plate that he keeps falling short of his potential. Anaheim's DH's were just awful last year, so at worst Fullmer should be an improvement on what they had before. But Angels fans should beware of having both Fullmer and Garret Anderson in the same lineup; they're going to see a lot of outs made from the left side of the plate.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Has been OK, and has plugged up a big hole for the Angels.
|
|
MINNESOTA - David Ortiz 26 L/L |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1998 | MIN | 86 | 278 | 77 | 20 | 0 | 9 | 47 | 46 | 39 | 72 | 277 | 371 | 446 | 1 | 0 | |
2000 | MIN | 130 | 415 | 117 | 36 | 1 | 10 | 59 | 63 | 57 | 81 | 282 | 364 | 446 | 1 | 0 | |
2001 | MIN | 89 | 303 | 71 | 17 | 1 | 18 | 46 | 48 | 40 | 68 | 234 | 324 | 475 | 1 | 0
| |
I stubbornly continue to believe that Ortiz will have a big season some day, even if he really hasn't done anything. Last year he was playing well until an injury knocked him out of the Twins' lineup; he then struggled when he returned. That's two major injuries that he has had in three years.
Still, he's young, he's big and strong, and he's the only power hitter that the Twins have. A big season is still in the cards.
|
|
NEW YORK YANKEES - Nick Johnson 24 L/L |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | AA | 132 | 420 | 145 | 33 | 5 | 14 | 114 | 87 | 123 | 88 | 345 | 525 | 548 | 8 | 6 | |
2001 | AAA | 110 | 359 | 92 | 20 | 0 | 18 | 68 | 49 | 81 | 105 | 256 | 407 | 462 | 9 | 2 | |
2001 | NYY | 23 | 67 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 194 | 308 | 313 | 0 | 0 | |
Johnson missed all of the 2000 season with a wrist injury. Last year he came back and played at Columbus, but didn't have a great season. He also got a few at bats with the Yankees, but wasn't impressive.
So the Yankees are going to make him their regular DH in 2002. Why? Because he's a great young player. His 1999 season was phenomenal, and established him as perhaps the best hitting prospect in the game. Last year was a disappointment, but I'll pin the blame on the missing season; hopefully, he'll get back on track this year.
Looking 3-4 years down the road, Johnson has Giambi-like potential, and ironically will be teamed with the Big Guy himself this year. I'm not sure how far away Johnson is from stardom, but at the very least he should be an improvement over Justice and Knoblauch.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Has struggled, but so far the Yankees have stuck with him; they don't seem inclined to either demote him or trade him. Look for Johnson in 2003.
|
|
TORONTO - Vernon Wells 23 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | AA-AAA | 59 | 235 | 76 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 38 | 38 | 22 | 37 | 323 | 376 | 498 | 11 | 3 | |
2000 | AAA | 107 | 493 | 120 | 31 | 7 | 16 | 76 | 66 | 48 | 88 | 243 | 313 | 432 | 23 | 4 | |
2001 | AAA | 127 | 413 | 116 | 27 | 4 | 12 | 57 | 52 | 29 | 68 | 281 | 333 | 463 | 15 | 11 | |
2001 | TOR | 30 | 96 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 313 | 350 | 427 | 5 | 0 | |
|
In 1999, Wells rocketed through four levels of ball and established himself, at age 20, as the Blue Jays' best prospect. Two disappointing years have since passed; last year's performance at Syracuse was a modest improvement on his ugly 2000 season, but it's still hard to say with any confidence whether this guy is going to be a good player.
He's only 23, so there is still time for him to develop. The Blue Jays already have three good outfielders, so Wells will probably open the season as a regular DH; he is a centre fielder by trade, and if he performs well, a trade and/or injuries will get him playing time in the outfield.
|
|
TAMPA BAY - Greg Vaughn 37 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | CIN | 153 | 550 | 135 | 20 | 2 | 45 | 104 | 118 | 85 | 137 | 245 | 347 | 535 | 15 | 2 | |
2000 | TAM | 127 | 461 | 117 | 27 | 1 | 28 | 83 | 74 | 80 | 128 | 254 | 365 | 499 | 8 | 1 | |
2001 | TAM | 136 | 485 | 113 | 25 | 0 | 24 | 74 | 82 | 71 | 130 | 233 | 333 | 433 | 11 | 5 | |
Vaughn doesn't do much except hit home runs, and he doesn't hit as many as he used to. He is a self-proclaimed "team leader", but it's tough to lead a team whose best player is a washed-up 37-year-old DH who can't stick in the lineup.
MID-SEASON UPDATE: Has raised his average to .163.
|
|
DETROIT - Dean Palmer 33 R/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | DET | 150 | 560 | 147 | 25 | 2 | 38 | 92 | 100 | 57 | 153 | 263 | 339 | 518 | 3 | 3 | |
2000 | DET | 145 | 524 | 134 | 22 | 2 | 29 | 73 | 102 | 66 | 146 | 256 | 338 | 471 | 4 | 2 | |
2001 | DET | 57 | 216 | 48 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 34 | 40 | 27 | 59 | 222 | 317 | 426 | 4 | 1
| |
|
Palmer's season was cut short by surgery to his shoulder. He apparently will be ready for spring training, and apparently is talking about playing third again. I'm going to list him as a DH anyways; Palmer was a terrible defensive player before he had the surgery, so I can't imagine that he will be any better now. He should just DH and hit some home runs and be happy.
|
|
KANSAS CITY - Dee Brown 24 L/R |
|
YEAR | TM | GM | AB | HT | DB | TP | HR | RUN | RBI | BB | SO | AVG | OBA | SLU | SB | CS |
| |
1999 | AA | 65 | 235 | 83 | 14 | 3 | 12 | 58 | 56 | 35 | 41 | 353 | 440 | 591 | 10 | 8 | |
2000 | AAA | 125 | 479 | 129 | 25 | 6 | 23 | 76 | 70 | 37 | 112 | 269 | 324 | 491 | 20 | 3 | |
2001 | KC | 106 | 380 | 93 | 19 | 0 | 7 | 39 | 40 | 22 | 81 | 245 | 286 | 350 | 5 | 3 | |
|
Brown was a super-prospect a couple of years ago, but he was disappointing in 2000 and just miserable in 2001. He may play right field this year if Mark Quinn can't get his act together, or he may just ride the bench. But the Royals desperately need good players; given Brown's age and ability, it's certainly worth giving him another chance.
|
|